![]() moreĪn applicant requested access to her personal information under the control of Investaflex Financial Group Ltd. 12(3)(b), 13(1), 14 and 17(1).Īn applicant requested access to her personal information under the control of Investaflex Financial. The adjudicator ordered the City to give the applicant access to the information the City was not authorized to refuse to disclose under ss. The adjudicator determined that the City was authorized to withhold some information under ss. 12(3)(b) (local public body confidences), 13(1) (advice and recommendations), 14 (solicitor-client privilege), and 17(1) (harm to the financial or economic interests of a public body) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). The City disclosed responsive records but withheld information under ss. The applicant requested meeting minutes and communications containing information about the process and history of how a parking lot development in the City of Port Coquitlam (the City) became a condominium development. The applicant requested communications related to instructions and guidance given to a Thompson Rive. Finally, the adjudicator decided there was no need to decide the Charter issue because she did not find the organization failed to comply with ss. 34 to make reasonable security arrangements to protect the personal information. The adjudicator found that PIPA authorized the organization, in part, to use but not disclose the individual’s personal information, but the organization had not complied with its duty under s. 2(b) and 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). 14 or 17 PIPA, those provisions unjustifiably infringe its freedom of expression and freedom of association under ss. The organization disputed these allegations and argued that if its use or disclosure of the individual’s personal information is found to be unreasonable under either ss. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) acts on the hypothalamus to reduce body temperature.An individual complained that the organization used, disclosed and failed to protect her personal information contrary to the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). Recent scientific evidence provides an alternative explanation of course. Using cannabis in religious rites appeased the gods and hence reduced the fever. Ancient Hindu texts attribute the onset of fever with the ‘hot breath of the gods’ who were angered by the afflicted person's behaviour. ![]() The ancient Hindus thought the medicinal benefits of cannabis were explained by pleasing the gods such as Shiva. Hindu legend holds that Shiva, the supreme Godhead of many sects, was given the title ‘The Lord of Bhang’, because the cannabis plant was his favourite food. ![]() ![]() These texts reported cannabis to treat a vast array of different health problems, including arthritis, depression, amenorrhea, inflammation, pain, lack of appetite and asthma. Therapeutic indications of cannabis are mentioned in the texts of the Indian Hindus, Assyrians, Greeks and Romans. The first documented case of its use dates back to 2800 BC, when it was listed in the Emperor Shen Nung's (regarded as the father of Chinese medicine) pharmacopoeia. Cannabis has been used for its alleged healing properties for millennia. ![]() The use of cannabis originated in central Asia or western China. Cannabis has a long and colourful history. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |